Comments on: Penguins Bylsma Needs to Earn His Spurs

By: Pens Lose Game 7, It’s Over : Birds of the Burgh

Pens Lose Game 7, It’s Over : Birds of the Burgh — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:24:31 +0000

[...] not the first to think that Dan Bylsma’s gameplan may be a little naive. You hear a ton about his plan of quick-outs, no D-to-D passes, a strong forecheck and SPEED, but [...]

By: Rick Buker

Rick Buker — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:50:04 +0000

Ah … the power(less) play. Talk about your can of worms. You’re right, Lawny, it really wasn’t all that great even with Sid and Geno (and Goligoski). But it’s gone from average to downright deplorable (wish we could decline penalties). I’m sure they work hard on it in practice, but whatever they’re doing isn’t translating to the games. The only thing that sticks in my head is they had Sid running things from the half-boards, and now they don’t have anyone filling that role. At times it seems like Letang, Kovalev and Neal are all trying to run the show, with no real quarterback emerging. The fact that Neal and Kovy like to freelance only adds to the confusion. I really don’t know what the solution is … other than getting a man-advantage goal to settle things down and get some confidence back.

By: Lawny Iris

Lawny Iris — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:41:00 +0000

Another Spur: Marching out the same PP day in and day out. Everyone knows it’s broken, what harm is there in at least trying to do something different? It can not get any worse then it is now. I (like most of you) cringe when we go on the man advantage. The no Sid or Geno excuse only goes so far. The PP has sucked for a long long time. If DB is unwilling or unable to fix it, hopefully Shero brings in a dedicated PP coach this summer that knows what they are doing

By: Rick Buker

Rick Buker — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:39:59 +0000

Excellent comments. When I alluded to the neutral-zone trap, I didn’t necessarily mean the Pens should hire Jacques Lemaire and become “New Jersey on the Mon.” But we definitely need to tighten things up defensively. There have been far too many times when the Bolts have gotten behind our ‘d’ and I attribute that to overkill on the “damn-the-torpedos-full-steam-ahead” approach. I know Bylsma likes a 70/30 split in zone time. But it’s what’s happening during the 30 percent in our end that concerns me. I just wonder how much attention he pays to defense in practices.

By: Coach Bombay

Coach Bombay — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:34:44 +0000

Tangradi brings some grit and size over Conner. I’d like to see Engelland in for Niskanen. It’s game 7 and things haven’t been working, there has to be a change before puck drop and it doesn’t seem like there will be. I’m baffled.

You’re right, our speed is an asset. But, only when the rest of our game is working. And, honestly, we haven’t even looked as fast the past couple of games.

By: Coach Bombay

Coach Bombay — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:31:21 +0000

I’m completely with you. I like Tangradi’s size in front of the net and I like Engelland’s toughness in front of the net on the flip side. What it all comes down to is, things aren’t working as they are and something needs to change. There’s no time left to hope they start to gel, it’s game 7. I don’t get it either…

By: Martin not St. Louis

Martin not St. Louis — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:25:51 +0000

You have to hope that the coaches are making changes behind the scenes to keep up with the other teams. For Bylsma being a guy who changed lines at the drop of a hat during the regular season, he sure doesn’t change much during the post season.

I am a big fan of the speed game Bylsma puts on the ice. I think it works, it has worked and it will continue to work. On defense he could stand a change or two.

Lovejoy or Niskanen should sit for Engelland. The Penguins need to be tougher around the net and neither of them are cutting it. Also, the pairing of Lovejoy and Niskanen seems to be the weakest link in the Pens armor. Why not split up one of the other pairs of D?

Tangradi for Conner? Tangradi for Kovalev? Either way would be better. Trading Tangradi for Kovalev you keep the same speed, and add some grit.

By: Rick Buker

Rick Buker — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:22:15 +0000

Thanks for your very insightful comments, Coach … You bring up a lot of really good points. It’s true, we don’t get to see what goes on at practice and in the lockerroom. And you’d like to trust that the coaching staff has a pulse on things and will make moves that will most benefit the team. But the Connor thing truly has me scratching my head. The kid tries, but that’s about all you can say. And I thought Tangradi showed decent speed in Game 4. It just doesn’t make sense. Alluding to the Engelland situation, last year when Bylsma benched McKee in favor of Leopold, he compounded the mistake by teaming Jordan with Goligoski. Yes, they handled the puck well. But they were completely overmatched physically by the Habs. Maxim Lapierre victimized Go Go twice for huge, game turning goals. I hoped Bylsma had learned from that. But by teaming Niskanen with Lovejoy, he’s essentially doing the same thing. Without Engelland back there to keep them honest, nobody on Tampa Bay has any fear of driving the net. I just don’t get it …

By: Coach Bombay

Coach Bombay — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:59:00 +0000

Excellent piece, Rick. I’ve often questioned many of Bylsma’s decisions. Last year was his first full season at the helm and things didn’t end so well in the playoffs. This start of this season was a challenge and I saw sparks of what seemed to be an evolving coaching style, but then he would resort to the same old friendly Dan. I give him all the credit in the world for getting the “kids” through February and March the way he did. But, like you, I have to wonder why he he so opposed to making line-up changes that the rest of us think would benefit the team (namely Tangradi and Engelland). Obviously, we’re not on the ice at practices or in the locker room. But, we do watch the games and see the outcomes and would like to think that things were learned from last year’s mistakes against Montreal.